With the and, USB-C (also called USB Type-C) and the accompanying USB 3.1 standard are both hitting market somewhat earlier than we initially expected. If you’re curious about the two standards and how they interact, we’ve dusted off and updated our guide to the upcoming technology. The situation is more nuanced than it’s been with previous USB standard updates — USB 3.1 and USB Type-C connectors may be arriving together on the new machines, but they aren’t joined at the hip the way you might think. USB Type-C: Fixing an age-old problemThe near-universal frustration over attempts to connect USB devices to computers has been a staple of nerd humor and lampooned in various ways until Intel finally found a way to take the joke quantum.
USB Type-C with a universal connector that’s also capable of twice the theoretical throughput of USB 3.0 and can provide far more power. That’s why Apple is pairing up Type-C and USB 3.1 to eliminate the power connector on the MacBook. It’s a goal we agree with, even if we’re less thrilled with the company’s decision to dump USB ports altogether with that single exception.
Usb Port Adapter
Google’s approach, in providing two USB-C and two regular USB 3.0 ports, is obviously preferable, even though it adds a bit of bulk to the machine. Type-C connectors will be shipped in a variety of passive adapters (an earlier version of this story erroneously asserted that such cables would not be available, Extremetech regrets the error). The spec provides for passive adapters with USB 3.0 / 3.1 on one end and USB Type-C on the other.
USB-C, USB 3.1 not always hooked togetherThe Type-C plug can be used with previous standards of USB, which means manufacturers don’t automatically have to adopt expensive 3.1 hardware if they want to include it in mobile devices. Apple, to be clear, is offering USB 3.1 on the new MacBook, though the company hasn’t disclosed which third party vendor is providing the actual chipset support. The upside to decoupling USB 3.1 from USB-C, however, is that companies can deploy the technology on mobile phones and tablets without needing to opt for interfaces that inevitably consume more power. Then again, some might argue that this would be a moot point — the USB controller can be powered down when it isn’t active, and when it is active, the device should be drawing power off the PC or charging port anyway. Heat dissipation could theoretically remain a concern — higher bandwidth inevitably means higher heat, and in devices built to 3-4W specifications, every tenth of a watt matters.
If I had to bet, I’d bet that the 100W power envelope on USB 3.1 will actually be of more practical value than the 10Gbps bandwidth capability. While it’s true that USB 3.1 will give external SSD enclosures more room to stretch their legs, the existing standard still allows conventional mechanical drives to run at full speed, while SSDs can hit about 80% of peak performance for desktop workloads. It might not be quite as good, but it’s a far cry from the days when using USB 2.0 for an external hard drive was achingly slow compared to SATA. Signal overhead is also expected to drop significantly, thanks to a switch to a 128-bit and 132-bit encoding scheme, similar to that used in PCI-Express 3.0. The ability to provide 100W of power, as opposed to 10W, however, means that nearly every manufacturers could ditch clunky power bricks. There would still be concern about ensuring that connect points were sufficiently reinforced, but provided such concerns can be accounted for, the vast majority of laptops could switch over to the new standard. Hard drives and other external peripherals could all be powered by single wires, as could USB hubs for multiple devices.The higher bandwidth is nice, and a major selling point, but the flippable connector and the power provisioning will likely make more difference in the day-to-day reality of life. As for, USB 3.1 will continue to lag Intel’s high-speed standard, but as bandwidth rises this gap becomes increasingly academic.
At this point, it’s the features USB doesn’t allow, like RAID and TRIM, that matter more than the raw bandwidth does in most cases. Apple’s MacBook will be first out the door with USB 3.1 and USB-C support, with vendors scurrying to match the company on both counts.
LaCie has announced a new revision of its that takes advantage of the Type-C connector, but only offers USB 3.0. It’s going to take time for the 3.1 spec to really show up on peripheral devices, even those that adopt the USB-C cable. Motherboard support outside the Apple MacBook is probably 4-5 months away, though the first peripheral cables should be available well before that point.Now read.
USB Type CThe latest USB connector, introduced in 2014. Using a plug and socket slightly larger than Micro USB, Type C is expected to eventually replace all USB connectors.
In 2015, the OnePlus 2, Nexus 5X and Nexus 6P were among the first Android phones to switch from Micro USB to Type C. See.More Speed and PowerUSB Type C supports multi-lane USB 3.2, which increased the transfer rate to 20 Gbps. At the base level, USB-C supports 5 volts at 3 amps, but ports can implement up to 20 volts at 5 amps (100 watts). See and.Alternate Modes for VideoUSB Type C also supports alternate modes for common video interfaces such as HDMI, MHL and DisplayPort. For example, a single C-to-C cable from laptop to monitor could send DisplayPort signals to the monitor while the monitor charges the laptop. See, and.Beware of Non-Compliant A-to-C CablesUSB Type C devices can draw more current than earlier Type A ports can deliver. Therefore, if a Type C device is used with a Type A 2.0 or 3.0 port, the cable should have a 56K Ohm resistor to prevent the port or computer from being damaged.
Universal Serial Bus ( USB) is pretty much the standard interface for most computer devices nowadays. Yugioh batch sub indo single link. We use USB ports to connect printers, keyboards / mice and smartphones, just to name a few.
But do you know how to tell the difference between a 1.x and 3.x port? Here's how to tell what kind of USB connection your computer or device has.When it comes to USB ports, what defines the features are called specifications (1.1, 2.0, etc.). USB connectors, whether it is the receptacle on your computer or the plug on the end of a cable, are often colored coded so you can tell what specification it is. But the is not part of the actual USB specifications and may vary from vendor to vendor. The following is list of USB specifications and the color usually associated with it. USB specifications by color White USB connector - USB 1.xWhite Type A USB 1.x plugThis was the first specification for USB and was released in 1996. It had some issues with extension cables / hubs and wasn't widely adapted.
It wasn't until version 1.1 in 1998 that it started to be used in manufacturing devices. Normally white connectors are USB 1.x, but quite a few are USB 2.x compatible. The transfer rate for USB 1.X was kind of slow at only 12 Mbps (megabit per second).
Usb Red Color
Black USB connector - USB 2.xBlack Type A USB 2.x plugThis is the second specification for USB and was released in 2000. It was labeled 'Hi-Speed' because it had a maximum transfer rate of 480 Mbps (megabit per second). It is completely backward compatible with USB 1.x.
Blue USB connector - USB 3.xBlue Type A USB 3.x plugThis is the third specification for USB and was released in 2008. It defines a new SuperSpeed mode, with transfer speeds up to 5 Gbps (gigabit per second).
It is completely backward compatible with USB 2.x. Red or Yellow USB connector - Sleep and ChargeRed Type A USB Sleep and Charge plugThis is not a USB specification, but more of a feature. This color indicates that the connector does not power off during sleep or standby mode.
On laptop or desktop computers they are great for charging external devices like smartphones. Its specification can be any of the above, so check your computer or device documentation for the exact one.
Comments are closed.
|
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |